In the context of media fusion, creators need to pay attention to the distribution of narrative resources from the beginning, so that the storyline can develop into another medium. And in order to ensure a unified narrative experience with comics, film directors need not only to communicate closely with the comics production team, but also to provide detailed guidance on the film.

Hypermedia narration provides the audience with two forms of participation: node participation and all-round participation. Full participation refers to the audience through television, movies, live animation, comics and the internet to explore the clues, to maintain the audience’s interest in their participation and enthusiasm, to develop the audience into a big fan of the fans. Weihua attaches great importance to the grandeur of the plot, which also allows the audience to keep up and participate in any node, and to take an interest in the direction and development of the subsequent plot. Both of these modes of participation embody an important feature of hypermedia narration: The various parts of the hypermedia narration are independent and integrated with each other.

When the parts are combined, they can play an unexpected, unprecedented overall effect, and in the process, the various parts will also emphasize the degree of cooperation with the media and their own characteristics, even if the node participation, but also can produce a good sense of generation, the audience quickly into the plot, so that it gets an excellent narrative experience. For example, “Captain America 2” is a story that stretches from the timeline of the Aegis agent, and the audience is able to get more story clues after watching the movie and quickly enter the follow-up storyline of the Aegis agent. At the same time, the company transforms the story perspective of “Aegis Agent” into “American team L”, can produce a stronger visual impact, so that the audience who has not seen the “Aegis Agent” can also devote themselves to the story plot.

Film is an image language, film is an ideological state apparatus, film is a cultural industry, all these definitions of film have their own rationality.

Director Ang Lee has lived in the United States for many years , Both Chinese and Western cultures know something about it. Modern film is not only entertainment , but also the dissemination of culture. 

Most of Ang Lee’s films are filmed by the fusion of Chinese and Western ideas , which build a bridge between East and West culture. “Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon” in the performance of Chinese traditional culture , the play has danqing calligraphy and painting , There are flying eaves , tea ceremony to calligraphy , From Confucianism to Zhuang Zen unscathed , 18 like weapons. Through the image of Li Mu Bai shows the oriental spirit of “inner Taoism”. And “Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon” is also the embodiment of the impact and integration of Chinese and Western culture representatives. “Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon” has built a bridge between eastern and Western cultural integration. Will be the traditional Chinese cultural world.

In the play of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. , Ang Lee used a plot clear line and a plot dark lines alternating development of the technique to complete their own Director vocabulary , Put forward their own views on eastern and Western cultures and the future of humanity as a whole. In this movie, Zhang Ziyi plays the Jade Dragon is clear line , It’s a representative symbol of Western culture. , A symbol of the infinite expansion of desire. , Symbolizes the need for people to open up freely and unlimited realization of their desires to pursue this idea. On the other hand , Chow Yun-Fat plays Li Mu Bai and Yang Zijiong as Shilin is dark lines , is the representative symbol of Oriental

Judgments need critical thinking, which is reflected vividly in Twelve Angry Men. In the 1957 American film Twelve Angry Men, an 18-year-old boy who was suspected of killing his father will be judged by the jury of the case made up of twelve persons of different professions. In the jury room they were to reach an unanimous decision that whether the boy was guilty or not. The whole movie lasts 96 minutes, and more than 90 minutes, there is only one scene, which is the room where the jury is discussing, and the main process is 12 men having conversations.

I believe many people like to watch Sherlock Holmes and detective conan series. So of these two series and Twelve Angry Men, what are the similarities and differences? It seems that the similarity between them is very obvious, is to use reasoning to determine whether the suspect is the real killer; But the difference between them is also very obvious. The detective series must use scenarios and the parties concerned to carry out investigation and reasoning, more emphasis on events, while Twelve Angry Men basically is to show the 12 members of the jury in expressing their claim. The difference in thinking reflected in these different characters is more stimulating to our experience.

For example, No. 8 on the jury was the only one who thought the boy innocent on the first vote. No. 3 asked him “Do you really think he is innocent?” He said, “I don’t know. I just want to know more about him.” Number 8 neither explicitly believes that the witness is not problematic, nor does he explicitly believe what the teenager says. He is not on either side of the argument, and his claim is the need for them is not to rush to conclusions based on “feelings”, but to discuss them. The thinking behind No. 8 is critical thinking — critical thinking occurs when we evaluate the reasoning that leads to conclusions. While the testimony of witnesses seems to “prove” that the teenager was the killer, it is still necessary to evaluate the reasoning given by others. This is in contrast to other people, who only found words to support their conclusions in the prosecutor’s statements, rather than in the “doubt-analysis-doubt” evaluation cycle. Therefore, they showed a lot of errors that should not occur in critical thinking in the dialogue， and that’s a mistake we often make.